| Back Testing Results | |||
| To have confidence in the system you should always run the profitability reports, if acceptable then the simulation analysis will allow you to determine how your trade management should be established | |||
|
Details of back test - using ASX 200 unfiltered list |
Comments - profitability uses all trades available whereas simulation uses trading capital limitations |
||
| Test 1 | |||
System
strategies (2010) issued
strategies with minor modifications for Australia to recognise trade
timing (Trending, Reversal and Breakout strategies)
|
Profitability - Daily trades
Simulation - daily trades
|
||
| Back Test assumptions | BT/FT 250/250, monthly boundaries, no dynamic optimisation, no slippage or commissions, voting method = majority of Longs | ||
| Simulation assumptions | Advisor rating 90%, Min Trader amount $5000, Cost per trade $15 | ||
| Test 2 | |||
Modified
system strategies (2011)
|
Profitability - daily trades
Simulation - daily
|
Profitability - Weekly Trades
Simulation - weekly
|
|
| Test 3 | |||
Modified system strategies (2011a)
|
Profitability - Daily Trades
Simulation - daily
|
Profitability - Weekly Trades
Simulation - weekly
|
|
| Trending Filter | Closing price > SMA (20) and TRII (32,16) indicator rising and > 20 | ||
| Gap Filter | less than 1 ATR on 5 times | ||
| Test 4 | |||
Modified system strategies (2011b)
|
Profitability - Daily Trades
Simulation - daily
|
Profitability - Weekly Trades
|
|
| Test 5 | |||
All strategies
|
|||
| Test 6 | |||
| NSP41 | |||